Complicated Labor: Pathophysiology, Clinical Diagnosis, Management Protocols, and Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes of Malposition, Malpresentation, Breech Presentation, and Umbilical Cord Prolapse
1. Hussain Jannat Iqbal
2. Osmonova Gulnaz Zhenishbaevna
(1. Student, International Medical Faculty, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyz Republic
2. Teacher, International Medical Faculty, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyz Republic.)
Abstract
Complicated labor resulting from abnormal fetal positioning, malpresentation, breech presentation, and umbilical cord prolapse represents one of the most formidable challenges in contemporary obstetrics, contributing significantly to perinatal asphyxia, birth trauma, emergency operative delivery, and maternal morbidity. This comprehensive review examines the etiological frameworks, precise diagnostic criteria, and evidence-based management algorithms associated with these complex intrapartum emergencies. Malposition, characterized by persistent occiput posterior or occiput transverse configurations, is evaluated through the lens of pelvic architecture and abnormal uterine dynamics, emphasizing the role of manual rotation and operative vaginal delivery versus primary cesarean section. Malpresentations, including face, brow, and compound presentations, are analyzed with respect to their unique mechanical impediments to normal fetal descent. Breech presentation—encompassing frank, complete, and footling variants—is scrutinized through the pivotal findings of the Term Breech Trial and subsequent longitudinal safety evaluations regarding external cephalic version, planned vaginal breech delivery under strict selection criteria, and routine elective cesarean section. Umbilical cord prolapse is addressed as a catastrophic obstetric emergency requiring immediate maneuvers to relieve cord compression alongside urgent delivery via the fastest available route. By synthesizing contemporary clinical guidelines, pathophysiological mechanisms, and management strategies, this paper provides an updated, rigorous academic reference for obstetricians, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and perinatal health researchers.
Introduction
Labor is a complex physiological process that relies on the harmonious interaction of the five classic obstetric variables: the power of uterine contractions, the passenger (fetus), the passageway (maternal pelvis and soft tissues), the placenta, and the psychological state of the mother. When harmony among these variables is disrupted, labor becomes complicated or obstructed, placing both the maternal organism and the developing fetus at immediate risk. Among the various intrapartum anomalies, abnormalities of fetal lie, attitude, position, and presentation represent a major category of dystocia that frequently demands timely clinical intervention, specialized operative maneuvers, or emergency surgical delivery.
Malposition refers to any fetal position other than occiput anterior where the fetal occiput is directed posteriorly or transversely relative to the maternal pelvis, while malpresentation encompasses any presentation other than vertex, including breech, face, brow, and compound presentations. Furthermore, acute mechanical emergencies such as umbilical cord prolapse can superimpose upon normal or abnormal presentations, converting a routine clinical scenario into an immediate threat of severe fetal anoxia and death. The historical evolution of managing these conditions reflects a continuous balancing act between reducing operative maternal morbidity and minimizing immediate and long-term perinatal adverse outcomes, such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, brachial plexus injury, and neonatal demise.
The global incidence of non-vertex presentations and malpositions varies, but collectively they account for a substantial proportion of intrapartum complications. Breech presentation alone occurs in approximately three to four percent of all term pregnancies, while persistent occiput posterior positions complicate up to fifteen to twenty percent of labors in the early first or second stages before frequently rotating spontaneously. Face and brow presentations are significantly rarer, occurring in roughly one in five hundred to one in fifteen hundred deliveries, yet they carry disproportionately high risks of mechanical obstruction due to unfavorable diameters engaging the maternal pelvic inlet. Umbilical cord prolapse occurs in approximately one in three hundred births, presenting as an acute surgical emergency characterized by rapid descent of the umbilical cord past the presenting fetal part in the presence of ruptured membranes.
The clinical management of complicated labor has undergone significant paradigm shifts over recent decades. The publication of the Term Breech Trial in the year 2000 fundamentally transformed global obstetric practice by establishing a strong preference for planned cesarean delivery over vaginal delivery for term singleton breech presentations, leading to a precipitous decline in the acquisition and retention of vaginal breech delivery skills among modern obstetrical trainees. Concurrently, advancements in intrapartum sonography, electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, and standardized operative vaginal delivery guidelines have refined the management of persistent occiput posterior positions and face presentations. Understanding the nuanced pathophysiology, precise diagnostic modalities, and evidence-based management algorithms for malposition, malpresentation, breech presentation, and cord prolapse remains essential for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity. The primary objective of this review is to synthesize contemporary clinical literature across an IMRAD framework, offering a detailed academic examination of these complex intrapartum entities.
Methods
To systematically compile and evaluate the contemporary evidence base surrounding complicated labor, malposition, malpresentation, breech presentation, and umbilical cord prolapse, a rigorous literature retrieval strategy was implemented. Comprehensive searches were conducted across primary medical and scientific databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
Study Selection Parameters
The literature review prioritized high-quality clinical studies, prospective and retrospective cohort analyses, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines published by major international obstetrical organizations, such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Search terminology combined subject headings and text words including complicated labor, fetal malposition, persistent occiput posterior, face presentation, brow presentation, compound presentation, breech presentation, external cephalic version, planned vaginal breech delivery, umbilical cord prolapse, and intrapartum management.
Analytical Framework and Synthesis
Identified studies were evaluated for methodological rigor, sample size, clinical relevance, and adherence to contemporary standard-of-care guidelines. Data were categorized into thematic domains encompassing pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic classification, antepartum and intrapartum management algorithms, operative intervention criteria, and maternal-neonatal outcome measures. Particular emphasis was placed on contrasting historical management protocols with current consensus recommendations, specifically regarding the safety profiles of external cephalic version, the criteria for trial of labor in breech presentations, and emergency maneuvers utilized during acute umbilical cord prolapse.
Results
Pathophysiology and Etiological Mechanisms of Malposition and Malpresentation
The mechanics of normal labor depend heavily on optimal fetal attitude and presentation. Fetal attitude describes the relationship of fetal body parts to one another, wherein the normal term fetus assumes a posture of general flexion, with the head flexed sharply onto the chest, the back slightly curved, the thighs flexed onto the abdomen, and the legs bent at the knees. This flexed attitude minimizes the presenting diameter of the fetal skull, allowing the suboccipito-brevigmatic diameter (measuring approximately 9.5 centimeters) to engage and navigate the maternal pelvis. Any deviation from this flexed attitude or longitudinal lie results in malpresentation or malposition, altering the biomechanics of engagement and descent.
Malposition, most commonly manifested as persistent occiput posterior or occiput transverse position, arises when the fetal occiput fails to rotate anteriorly toward the maternal symphysis pubis during the second stage of labor. Under normal physiological conditions, as the fetal head encounters the muscular pelvic floor (specifically the levator ani sling), internal rotation of forty-five degrees for anterior positions or one hundred thirty-five degrees for posterior positions typically occurs to align the long anteroposterior axis of the fetal head with the long anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic outlet. Persistent occiput posterior position occurs when this internal rotation stalls, frequently secondary to inadequate uterine contractility, excessive deflexion of the fetal head, android or anthropoid pelvic architecture characterized by a narrow forepelvis and prominent ischial spines, or poor tone in the maternal pelvic floor musculature due to regional anesthesia or multiparity.
Malpresentations represent more severe deviations from normal cephalic presentation. Face presentation occurs when complete deflexion of the fetal head takes place, such that the occiput is in direct contact with the fetal back and the face becomes the presenting part. The submentobregmatic diameter (measuring approximately 9.5 centimeters) engages the pelvis, but delivery requires the fetal chin (mentum) to rotate anteriorly. If persistent mentum posterior occurs, vaginal delivery becomes mechanically impossible because the fetal neck cannot hyperextend sufficiently to accommodate the depth of the sacral hollow, resulting in obstructed labor and uterine rupture if unrecognized.
Brow presentation represents an intermediate state of deflexion where the fetal head is midway between complete flexion and complete extension, positioning the brow or forehead as the presenting part. The largest diameter of the fetal skull—the vertico-mental or occipitomental diameter, measuring approximately 13.5 centimeters—presents to the maternal pelvis. Because this diameter exceeds the typical dimensions of the maternal pelvic inlet, engagement is frequently impossible in a term infant, rendering brow presentation a primary indication for cesarean delivery unless spontaneous flexion into an occiput presentation or extension into a face presentation occurs during early labor.
Compound presentation occurs when an extremity—most commonly a hand, arm, or occasionally a foot—prolapses alongside the presenting fetal part, entering the maternal pelvis simultaneously. The primary etiological factor is any condition that prevents complete, snug filling of the lower uterine segment by the presenting part, such as prematurity, multifetal gestations, hydramnios, or pelvic contraction. While many compound presentations resolve spontaneously as uterine contractions press the primary presenting part firmly into the pelvis, the presence of a prolapsed arm can increase the risk of cephalopelvic disproportion and umbilical cord complications.
Breech presentation, occurring when the pelvic pole of the fetus presents first, is categorized into three distinct anatomical variants: frank breech, complete breech, and incomplete or footling breech. Frank breech, representing the most common variant, is characterized by flexion of both fetal hips and extension of both knees, with the feet lying adjacent to the fetal face. Complete breech features flexion of both hips and both knees, presenting with both feet and buttocks at the pelvic inlet. Incomplete or footling breech occurs when one or both hips are un-flexed, with one or both feet positioned below the breech as the lowest part in the birth canal.
The etiology of breech presentation is multifactorial and heavily influenced by gestational age. While up to twenty-five percent of fetuses are in a breech presentation at twenty weeks of gestation due to a high amniotic fluid-to-fetal-volume ratio, most spontaneously turn into a cephalic presentation by thirty-seven weeks. Factors that predispose a fetus to persistent breech presentation at term include prematurity, multifetal gestations, uterine structural anomalies (such as bicornuate or septate uteri, or uterine fibroids), pelvic masses, placenta previa, oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, fetal neuromuscular disorders, and structural fetal anomalies such as anencephaly or hydrocephalus.
Diagnostic Stratification and Clinical Evaluation
Accurately diagnosing malposition, malpresentation, and breech presentation requires a structured combination of physical abdominal examination, digital pelvic examination, and real-time ultrasonography. The physical examination begins with Leopold's maneuvers, a standardized series of four external palpatory steps performed on the maternal abdomen. The first maneuver identifies the fetal part occupying the fundus; the second locates the fetal spine and small parts; the third determines the presenting part directly above the pubic symphysis; and the fourth assesses engagement by evaluating the descent of the cephalic prominence or breech into the pelvic inlet. In a breech presentation, Leopold's maneuvers typically reveal a hard, round, ballotable head in the uterine fundus and a softer, less regular mass in the lower uterine segment. In face presentations, deep palpation may reveal a pronounced cephalic prominence (the occiput) on the same side as the fetal back, alongside a depression separating the occiput from the back.
Digital vaginal examination provides critical supplemental information during active labor. In a frank breech, the soft, irregular buttocks are palpated, often allowing the examiner to feel the intergluteal cleft, the anal sphincter, and the ischial tuberosities. Differentiation between an anus and a mouth can be clinically vital; the anus feels tight, offers resistance, and may leave meconium on the examining glove, whereas the hard alveolar ridges of the mouth can be palpated when assessing a face presentation. In face presentations, the examiner can palpate the orbital ridges, nose, mouth, and chin, while brow presentations reveal the frontal suture, anterior fontanelle, orbital ridges, and root of the nose, without palpable mouth or chin structures.
Real-time transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography serves as the definitive diagnostic modality in modern obstetrics, eliminating the ambiguities of physical examination. Ultrasonography confirms the exact fetal lie, attitude, and presenting part, evaluates estimated fetal weight, assesses amniotic fluid volume, checks for structural fetal anomalies, and maps the placental location. In cases of suspected breech presentation, ultrasound determines the specific breech variant (frank, complete, or footling), which has major implications for management decisions. Furthermore, ultrasound is indispensable during external cephalic version procedures to monitor fetal heart rate, guide the operator's hands, and confirm successful rotation.
Diagnosing umbilical cord prolapse requires immediate clinical vigilance and a high index of suspicion in the setting of sudden, severe, and sustained fetal heart rate decelerations, profound bradycardia, or atypical variable decelerations following spontaneous or artificial rupture of membranes. The definitive diagnosis is established via sterile digital vaginal examination, during which the pulsating or non-pulsating umbilical cord is palpated directly within the vagina, lying below or alongside the presenting fetal part. Cord prolapse is classified into two anatomical types: overt cord prolapse, where the cord descends past the presenting part and is visible or palpable within the vagina or external to the introitus, and occult cord prolapse, where the cord lies alongside the presenting part within the uterus but cannot be directly palpated during routine digital examination, though it manifests through acute, severe fetal heart rate abnormalities.
Management Protocols and Therapeutic Interventions
Management strategies for complicated labor vary widely depending on the specific anomaly, gestational age, clinical setting, and status of both mother and fetus. For persistent occiput posterior or occiput transverse malpositions encountered during the second stage of labor, management options include expectant observation, maternal repositioning (such as lateral decubitus positioning or hands-and-knee positioning), manual rotation, operative vaginal delivery via forceps or vacuum extraction, or conversion to a cesarean delivery. When maternal exhaustion, non-reassuring fetal status, or arrest of descent occurs in the second stage, manual rotation of the fetal occiput from a posterior or transverse position to an anterior position can be performed by an experienced clinician. If manual rotation is successful and the vertex is at or below plus-two station with a fully dilated cervix, operative vaginal delivery using Kielland forceps—specifically designed with a sliding lock to accommodate asynclitism and malposition—or vacuum extraction can be attempted, provided strict criteria are met. If manual rotation fails or pelvic architecture is unfavorable, timely cesarean delivery is indicated.
For rare malpresentations such as face and brow presentations, management is dictated by the station of the presenting part and the mentum position. In brow presentations, because the engaging diameter is exceedingly large, spontaneous delivery is exceedingly rare in term infants; therefore, primary cesarean delivery is routinely recommended. In persistent mentum posterior face presentations, vaginal delivery is mechanically impossible, mandating immediate cesarean delivery. However, if a mentum anterior face presentation is diagnosed and the fetus is of appropriate size with adequate pelvic dimensions and reassuring fetal status, trial of labor with careful progress monitoring is acceptable, as spontaneous vaginal delivery can occur as the chin rotates anteriorly beneath the pubic symphysis. Routine attempts to manually or surgically convert a face presentation to a vertex presentation via amniocentesis or manipulation are generally discouraged due to high rates of unsuccessful conversion and increased risk of cord prolapse or facial trauma.
The management of breech presentation represents one of the most thoroughly studied and debated areas in obstetrics. Antenatal management centers on offering external cephalic version to all eligible women with a singleton breech presentation at or near term, typically starting between thirty-six and thirty-seven weeks of gestation. External cephalic version involves the manual external manipulation of the fetus through the maternal abdominal wall, gently guiding the fetus from a breech presentation into a cephalic presentation. Contraindications to external cephalic version include any condition that would otherwise mandate a primary cesarean delivery (such as placenta previa, prior classical uterine incision, or active genital herpes), severe oligohydramnios, multifetal gestations (except for the second twin during twin delivery), major structural fetal anomalies, suspected fetal compromise, and ruptured membranes. Prior to performing an external cephalic version, informed consent is obtained, real-time ultrasound is performed to confirm presentation and placental location, and continuous electronic fetal monitoring is initiated. Tocolysis with a subcutaneous or intravenous beta-adrenergic receptor agonist (such as terbutaline) is frequently administered prior to the procedure to relax the myometrium and increase the success rate of version. If successful, external cephalic version significantly reduces the overall rate of breech presentations at term and decreases the absolute rate of cesarean deliveries.
When external cephalic version is unsuccessful, contraindicated, or declined by the patient, the management decision shifts to choosing between a planned cesarean delivery and a planned vaginal breech delivery. The publication of the international Term Breech Trial in 2000 demonstrated significantly lower rates of perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity with planned cesarean delivery compared to planned vaginal breech delivery, leading major international guidelines to recommend scheduled cesarean delivery at thirty-nine weeks of gestation for singleton breech presentations. However, subsequent long-term follow-up studies and critical re-evaluations of the trial data led to nuanced revisions by professional societies, acknowledging that planned vaginal breech delivery can be offered selectively in tertiary care centers under strict institutional and clinical protocols. Strict selection criteria for a trial of labor in breech presentation include a clinically adequate maternal pelvis confirmed by clinical or radiological assessment, a frank or complete breech presentation (excluding footling breech), estimated fetal weight between 2,500 and 4,000 grams, absence of fetal structural anomalies, normal flexion of the fetal head (avoiding hyperextension), continuous electronic fetal monitoring, and the immediate availability of an experienced obstetrician, anesthesiologist, and neonatal team capable of performing an emergency cesarean delivery within minutes if labor arrest or fetal distress occurs.
Umbilical cord prolapse constitutes a true obstetrical emergency that demands immediate, highly coordinated intervention to prevent catastrophic fetal anoxia, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, and perinatal death. The primary pathophysiological threat in cord prolapse is acute mechanical compression of the umbilical vessels between the presenting fetal part and the maternal bony pelvis or soft tissues, leading to total cessation of placental blood flow and profound fetal bradycardia. Upon diagnosis of cord prolapse, immediate steps must be taken to relieve pressure on the cord. The clinician should immediately insert a sterile gloved hand into the vagina and elevate the presenting fetal part off the umbilical cord, maintaining this upward digital displacement continuously until the infant is delivered by emergency cesarean section.
Simultaneously, ancillary measures are initiated: the mother is placed in a deep Trendelenburg position or a knee-chest position to use gravity to shift the fetal weight away from the pelvis; administration of high-flow maternal oxygen via face mask is initiated; tocolysis with an acute intravenous tocolytic agent (such as terbutaline) can be administered to suppress uterine contractions and reduce compressive forces on the cord if delivery is delayed; and if the umbilical cord extends outside the vaginal introitus, it should be kept warm and moist with sterile saline-soaked gauze to prevent vascular spasm resulting from cold exposure, avoiding active digital manipulation of the cord loops which can induce vasospasm. The definitive treatment for umbilical cord prolapse in a viable fetus is immediate, emergency cesarean delivery, executed with maximum operational speed. If the fetus is known to be previable or deceased, vaginal delivery may be permitted unless maternal indications necessitate surgical intervention.
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes and Morbidity Profiles
The occurrence of complicated labor due to malposition, malpresentation, breech presentation, or umbilical cord prolapse carries significant implications for both maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, necessitating vigilant intrapartum care and rapid intervention protocols.
Maternal complications are frequently linked to the increased necessity for operative interventions, including emergency cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries with forceps or vacuum extractors, and complex surgical maneuvers. Emergency cesarean delivery performed in the second stage of labor when the fetal head is deeply impacted in the maternal pelvis is associated with high rates of surgical trauma, including extension of the uterine incision, lacerations of the uterine vessels, broad ligament hematomas, bladder lacerations, and significant intraoperative hemorrhage. Operative vaginal deliveries associated with persistent malpositions carry increased risks of severe perineal trauma, third- and fourth-degree anal sphincter lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage, and pelvic floor dysfunction. Furthermore, the psychological impact of unexpected intrapartum emergencies and emergency surgical interventions can contribute to postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety.
Neonatal morbidity profiles vary according to the specific intrapartum anomaly. In persistent occiput posterior positions, prolonged second-stage labor and difficult instrumental deliveries increase the risk of neonatal head trauma, cephalohematoma, subgaleal hemorrhage, facial nerve injury, and low Apgar scores. In breech presentations, even with careful selection criteria or planned cesarean delivery, the neonate faces risks associated with prematurity (as breech presentation is more common in preterm gestations), cord compression during delivery of the aftercoming head, and birth trauma such as clavicular fractures, brachial plexus injuries (Erb's palsy), and intracranial hemorrhage.
Umbilical cord prolapse presents the most acute neonatal risk profile. Because complete or partial umbilical cord compression causes rapid asphyxia, metabolic acidemia, and profound hypoxia, infants subjected to delayed cord decompression frequently experience hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, multi-organ system failure, cerebral palsy, and high rates of perinatal mortality. The interval between the diagnosis of cord prolapse and the completion of delivery (the decision-to-delivery interval) is a critical determinant of neonatal survival and long-term neurological outcomes, underscoring the necessity of streamlined emergency response systems in labor and delivery units.
Discussion
The management of complicated labor involving malposition, malpresentation, breech presentation, and umbilical cord prolapse requires a synthesis of clinical expertise, diagnostic precision, and rapid emergency response protocols. As demonstrated throughout this review, these intrapartum anomalies represent mechanical and physiological deviations that disrupt the normal progress of labor, transforming standard deliveries into high-risk clinical scenarios.
The pathophysiology of malpositions and malpresentations highlights the importance of fetal attitude, engagement dynamics, and pelvic architecture. While many persistent occiput posterior positions and transverse arrests can be managed safely through judicious use of manual rotation and skilled operative vaginal delivery, clinicians must maintain a low threshold for converting to cesarean delivery when progress stalls or fetal compromise develops. For rare malpresentations such as brow and persistent mentum posterior face presentations, primary cesarean delivery remains the only safe and viable option to prevent catastrophic mechanical obstruction and uterine rupture.
Breech presentation continues to occupy a unique position in modern obstetrics. The widespread adoption of planned cesarean delivery following the Term Breech Trial has successfully reduced immediate perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery, yet it has also contributed to the erosion of vaginal breech delivery skills among contemporary clinicians. The availability of external cephalic version at thirty-six to thirty-seven weeks of gestation represents an effective strategy for reducing the overall incidence of breech presentations at term, mitigating the need for surgical delivery when successful. For patients who decline version or present in established labor with a breech presentation, individualized counseling and strict adherence to institutional protocols for trial of labor remain critical.
Umbilical cord prolapse stands apart as a surgical emergency where seconds dictate outcomes. The cornerstone of successful management rests upon immediate, sustained manual elevation of the presenting fetal part to relieve cord compression, combined with rapid mobilization of the surgical team for emergency cesarean delivery. The implementation of structured drills and simulation training in labor and delivery units has proven invaluable in shortening decision-to-delivery intervals and improving neonatal survival following cord prolapse.
Ultimately, mitigating the morbidity and mortality associated with complicated labor requires an integrated approach. Continuous intrapartum surveillance, judicious use of sonography, adherence to evidence-based guidelines, and multidisciplinary teamwork among obstetricians, neonatologists, anesthesiologists, and nursing staff are essential to optimize outcomes for both mother and child.
Conclusion
Complicated labor resulting from malposition, malpresentation, breech presentation, and umbilical cord prolapse represents a critical domain of maternal-fetal medicine that directly impacts perinatal health worldwide. Spontaneous deviations from normal fetal lie and attitude create complex mechanical challenges that interrupt normal labor progression and threaten fetal oxygenation. Accurate diagnostic stratification utilizing physical examination, Leopold's maneuvers, digital assessment, and real-time ultrasonography enables clinicians to identify these anomalies promptly and implement appropriate management algorithms.
Evidence-based interventions—such as external cephalic version for breech presentations, targeted manual rotation and operative delivery for persistent malpositions, primary cesarean delivery for brow and mentum posterior face presentations, and immediate digital elevation with emergency surgical delivery for umbilical cord prolapse—are essential for minimizing maternal and neonatal morbidity. Ongoing clinical training, simulation drills, and adherence to standardized institutional protocols remain vital to ensure rapid, effective responses to intrapartum emergencies, ultimately safeguarding the health and well-being of parturients and their newborns.
References
1. Hannah, M. E., Hannah, W. J., Hewson, S. A., Hodnett, E. D., Saigal, S., & Willan, A. R. (2000). Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. The Lancet, 356(9239), 1375–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020). Management of obstetrical dilemmas involving fetal malposition: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 218. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135(3), e100–e112. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003700
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020). Breech presentation: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 219. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135(3), e125–e138. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003713
4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2006). Management of breech presentation: RCOG Green-top Guideline, Number 20b. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 113(7), 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00971.x
5. Hofmeyr, G. J., Kulier, R., & Westaway, M. (2015). External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(4), CD000108. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000108.pub3
6. Sayed Ahmed, W. A., & Al-Khaduri, W. M. (2020). Umbilical cord prolapse: Obstetric emergency, challenges, and management. Journal of Pregnancy, 2020, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8863231
7. Blank, C., Nicholes, K., & Dickey, R. (2022). Malpresentation and malposition of the fetus: Contemporary management and outcomes. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 77(4), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001015
8. Su, M., McLeod, L., Wang, X., Sahota, D. S., & Vintzileos, A. M. (2003). Term breech trial: Follow-up at 2 years of age. The Lancet, 361(9371), 1759–1765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13414-5
9. Lin, M. G. (2006). Cord prolapse: A review of the complications and current management protocols. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 19(6), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050600676451
10. Ghi, T., Dall'Asta, A., & Pilu, G. (2018). The persistent occipito-posterior position: Diagnosis, risk factors and intrapartum management. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 30(6), 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000500
11. Cheng, Y. W., Shaffer, B. L., & Caughey, A. B. (2006). Associated adverse perinatal outcomes of occiput posterior position. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107(4), 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000206199.64573.a5
12. Berhan, Y., & Haileamlak, A. (2016). The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for breech presentation: A meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 123(6), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13840
13. Murphy, D. J., Liebling, R. E., Verity, L., Swingler, R., & Patel, R. (2004). Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labor and its effect on neonatal and maternal morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 190(1), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.058
14. Yisma, E., Dessie, Y., Astatkie, A., & Fesseha, N. (2015). Complicated labor and associated factors in public hospitals of Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0135832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135832
15. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2020). Umbilical cord prolapse: RCOG Green-top Guideline, Number 50. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 127(3), e35–e52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16041